Dianabol Cycle

User Menu

The user menu serves as the central hub for any> Title: "Getting the list of all posts from https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts using curl"

> Body:
> ```text
> I want to retrieve the entire collection of posts from the JSONPlaceholder test API.

>
> The endpoint is:
> GET https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts
>
> I tried this in my terminal:
> curl -X GET https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts
>
> But it just returns a long string of characters, and I can't see the JSON structure.

>
> How can I properly format the output so that I can view the data as readable JSON? Also, are there any authentication requirements for this endpoint?
> ```
> Answer:
> ```text
> The API is public; no authentication needed.

> To pretty‑print the JSON in curl you can pipe it through a formatter:
> curl https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts | python -m json.tool
>
> Or use jq:
> curl https://jsonplaceholder.typicode.com/posts | jq .
>
> This will give you indented, readable JSON. If you just want the raw data for processing in a script, you can leave it as is.
> ```



Now we have to analyze if there are any overlapping phrases between reference answer and other answers.



We need to find phrase(s) that appear in both with high similarity. The instruction says: "Replace non-matching parts within a matching phrase with '...'." So we should produce a phrase that matches across the two texts, but we can drop some differences using ellipsis.



Potential matches:





"The key observation is that" appears in reference answer; does it appear elsewhere? Let's search: In other answers: #3: "The key point is that" not same. #2: Not present. #4: Not present. So no match.



"If you want to" appears many times across the other answers (#1, #2, #3). The reference answer also has "If you want to get an inequality in terms of \(|x|\) only". That phrase includes "If you want to get". But maybe we can use ellipsis: "If you want to ...". This phrase might be considered a match if the rule says ignore short phrases? The rule: "Ignore very short common phrases, such as 'In fact ...'. Matching phrases should only be those that are unlikely to occur in the other answers by chance." "If you want to" is quite generic and may appear by chance. But it's repeated across many answers. The rule might treat it as a phrase but maybe too generic. However, we could produce a matching phrase like:



Matching phrase: `"If you want to ..."`.

But that might be considered too short/generic.



Another potential match: "for example" appears in both? Let's check other answers for "for example".



Other answer 1: "For example, with the current implementation of `update`". Yes includes "For example".



Other answer 2: "For example:" yes. Other answer 3: not sure. Others maybe.



But again it's generic phrase.



Another phrase: "the following" appears in many answers; but generic.



Maybe we can produce a more specific phrase like:



Matching phrase: `"you need to keep the original"`? Let's see if any other answer has similar phrase. Search for "original". In other answers: Answer 1: not. Answer 2: not. Answer 3: "original list" maybe but not.



Answer 4: "original list of values". Not same.



But "keep the original" appears in answer 5? Let's check: "you have to keep the current order of the data if you want to be able to map back from a cluster label to the original observation." That phrase includes "have to keep the current order", not exactly same but close.



Thus there is moderate similarity.



But we need to produce a probability distribution. Considering that many other answers are unrelated topics (SQL, Git, etc.), and only the phrase "keep the original" appears in both, maybe the chance of being considered similar by evaluation is low (~0.2). However, if the evaluator expects exact phrase match or at least 3-word overlap like "you have to keep", which appears in answer 6: "you have to keep the current order" vs. reference "keep the original". That's 3 words? Actually "keep the original" is 3 words; "have to keep" is different. So not same.



Thus probability of similarity maybe 0.15.



Let's output JSON: